Okay, I hate blogs. I mean I don't hate them...some are very useful (http://www.insidesocal.com/kings is a good source for LA Kings info...okay the only source for LA Kings info), but most are blah. But, since I have a blog now, I feel like I should populate it and as it just so happens I felt compelled to write about what I just saw on ABC and I had no other forum for my anger since Kelly is out tonight. Alas, you'll have to suffer in her absence.
So I Tivo'd this ABC special about secret messages Michaelangelo may have hidden about religion in the Sistine Chapel. Anti-religious messages blatantly on display in a church? Count me in!
Anywho, as I was Tivoing through I see a "Viewer Discretion Advised" warning. I rewind because I can't wait to see what's so controversial. Is there some long lost interview with Michaelangelo where he drops the f' bomb or perhaps Michaelangelo going to church with Reverend Wright? Nope. The warning read as follows:
Viewer Discretion Advised. This program contains Renaissance Art images that depict nudity.
IS THIS A JOKE?!?! I mean seriously. Are we sooooo beholden to the FCC and the lunatics on the Right that we have a warning about this? It's culture people. The depiction of nudity in art is just that...art...culture...whatever you want to call it. Anyone who is so ignorant to complain about nudity in a Michaelangelo painting is an idiot and should have their television taken away from them.
What's next? Ratings at museums?
"I'd love to take my child to the Degas exhibit, but it's rated PG-13 and I'm afraid those tutus on the ballerinas are too revealing."
OR
"That Dali painting is rated NC-17. I will not expose my child to this! Now if you'll excuse me, the family is sitting down to watch CSI."
In a country where John Kerry was too educated to vote for or Barack Obama is too elitist because he can't bowl, do we really need to further go down this road of cultural ignorance to the point of this mild form of censorship?
The irony is, the last segment of the special was about how when Michaelangelo finished the painting, parts of it were so graphic that some (see: Catholic Church) want the nudity covered up. A compromise was reached and years later clothes were painted on them. It wasn't until a restoration centuries later that the clothes were removed and returned to how Michaelangelo intended them. Can you imagine a politician covering up nudity today. Oh wait, John Ashcroft did it.
Why not drop ABC a line and let them know what you think. Only, not that they showed nudity, but that they insulted our intelligence by having that warning. They can be reached at:
http://abc.go.com/contactus.html?id=ABCCOMGlobalFooter&lpos=CONTACT